Immigration Law: Visa for Spousal Reunification and Requirements for Proving Support of a Terrorist Organization

Administrative Court of Berlin, December 1, 2010, Case No.: 34 K 257.09 V

1. Introduction and Background of the Case

This case involves a legal dispute between an Algerian national and the German authorities regarding a visa application for spousal reunification with his German wife and their child. The visa was denied by the German Embassy in Algiers, based on suspicions that the applicant had supported terrorist groups. The decision was grounded on the assumptions of German security agencies, which suspected the applicant of being part of the jihadist scene in Hamburg. The applicant denied these allegations and filed a lawsuit against the visa denial, which was eventually heard before the Administrative Court of Berlin.

2. 2. Facts of the Case and the Applicant’s Previous Stay in Germany

The applicant, an Algerian national, entered Germany in 2000 on a Schengen visa but remained illegally after the visa expired. In 2005, he was found in an apartment in Hamburg, which had two beds, and was in possession of a forged French identity card. The applicant was later sentenced to a five-month suspended sentence for illegal residency and document forgery and was deported from Germany. After his deportation, he made several attempts to obtain a visa for spousal reunification, all of which were denied due to security concerns and the deportation ban.

3. 3. Security Concerns and Visa Denial

German security agencies suspected that the applicant was involved with the jihadist scene in Hamburg and had ties to terrorist activities. These suspicions were based on various factors, including the applicant’s alleged association with individuals considered members of the jihadist community and his supposed approval of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The security agencies argued that the applicant’s connection to the Islamist scene posed a threat to public safety and order. As a result, his visa application was repeatedly denied.

4. 4. Legal Proceedings Before the Administrative Court of Berlin

The Administrative Court of Berlin scrutinized the allegations made by the German security agencies. The court found that many of the claims were not adequately substantiated. For instance, the allegation that the applicant had praised the September 11 attacks could not be conclusively proven. Additionally, the suspicion that the applicant was part of the jihadist scene was not supported by substantial evidence. The court emphasized that mere suspicions or superficial connections were insufficient to justify such a significant decision.

5. Judgment of the Administrative Court of Berlin

The Administrative Court of Berlin ruled in favor of the applicant. The court determined that the denial of the visa was unlawful and violated the applicant’s rights. The court highlighted that the applicant had a legal entitlement to a visa for spousal reunification under § 28 Abs. 1 AufenthG. The doubts regarding the sincerity of the marriage were dispelled by the consistent statements of the couple during a separate interview, the birth of their child, and their long-term cohabitation in Algeria. The court also noted that the general issuance requirements under § 5 Abs. 1 AufenthG were met, and there was no sufficient evidence to support an expulsion interest under § 54 Nr. 5 AufenthG.

6. 6. Conclusion and Significance of the Judgment

The ruling by the Administrative Court of Berlin underscores the need for careful examination and solid evidence when denying visa applications on security grounds. The judgment clarifies that mere suspicions and inadequately substantiated accusations are insufficient to warrant such a significant decision. The court stressed that the applicant’s right to family reunification and the right to protect family life should not be unjustifiably restricted. This ruling strengthens the legal position of foreign nationals who are prevented from entering Germany based on unproven allegations.

Source: Administrative Court of Berlin

Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty. Important Notice: The content of this article has been created to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, due to the complexity and constant changes in the subject matter, we must exclude any liability and warranty.

If you need legal advice, please feel free to call us at 0221 - 80187670 or send us an email at or send an email to info@mth-partner.de info@mth-partner.de

Lawyers in Cologne advise and represent clients nationwide in immigration law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *